Voiding Unsecured Mortgages in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

July 14th, 2010

Under 11 USC Section 506, an unsecured second and/or third mortgage may be voided if it is determined that the whole mortgage is deemed “unsecured.”  In today’s real estate market the value of most houses has dramatically decreased leaving many homeowners to pay on additional mortgages that are not secured by the value of the house.  For example, if a home is appraised by a Certified Pennsylvania Real Estate Appraiser in the amount of $300,000.00 and is encumbered by a first mortgage in the amount of $300,000.00 or less any 2nd or even 3rd mortgage(s) would be deemed unsecured based on the appraised value of the subject property.  The voiding or stripping of additional mortgages can only be done in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy proceeding and is inapplicable through a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.  Furthermore, the process of voiding a wholly unsecured mortgage is done by way of an Adversary Proceeding filed against the subject mortgage company in the United States Bankruptcy Court.  The Adversary is generally titled a Complaint to Determine Validity of Lien Held by the name of the subject mortgage company.  The goal of the Adversary Complaint is for the Court to enter and Order reclassifying the 2nd or 3rd mortgage(s) as an “unsecured” debt, therefore relieving the filing  party of their obligation to pay their contractual mortgage payments. 

11 USC Section 506 is cited below in relevant part:

Determination of secured status. (a)(1)An allowed claim of a creditor secured by a lien on property in which the estate has an interest, or that is subject to setoff under section 553of this title, is a secured claim to the extent of the value of such creditor’s interest in the estate’s interest in such property, or to the extent of the amount subject to setoff, as the case may be, and is an unsecured claim to the extent that the value of such creditor’s interest or the amount so subject to setoff is less than the amount of such allowed claim.

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy law in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or toll free at (877) 4-LAW-411 or email brad@sadeklaw.com. Thank you.

Bankruptcy and Co-signers

June 25th, 2010
42-15425536
First, let me define what a co-signer is. A co-signer is the person who legally guarantees another person’s credibility to obtain a loan. A co-signer is sometimes required if the primary loan applicant has a negative credit history, according to the lender.  A co-signer accepts to be responsible for the repayment of the loan should the primary borrower fail to make regular and timely payments.
By virtue of contract, if the debtor fails to pay on the loan on a regular and timely basis, the co-signor is legally deemed responsible.   The co-signor is obligated to repay the debt even if they never used or had possession of the collateral in which they co-signed for. 
If the primary borrower files for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection he/she will most likely not be legally responsible for the repayment of the debt.  However, the co-signor will be responsbile for the outstanding debt, if any.  To avoid co-signor responsibility the primary borrower may file a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy or the co-signor themselves may seek to file a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy as well. 
In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy the primary borrower will repay the debt, therefore avoiding any co-signor responsibility.  The good news is that in the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, the Debtor has up to 5 years to repay the original debt and at a zero (0%) interest rate, thus lowering the payments and making them affordable.    Further, since the debt is being repaid, the co-signor is not liable for payments. 
If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy law in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email brad@sadeklaw.com. Thank you.

Refusal to Submit to a Breathalyzer or Blood Test: Probably Not A Good

June 11th, 2010

Under the Pennsylvania Vehicle Code, no one is required to submit to a breathalyzer or blood test after a DUI/DWI arrest.  However, any individual who refuses to submit to a breathalyzer or blood test after a DUI/DWI arrest automatically loses his or her license for one year.  PennDOT will automatically suspend your license for one year.

Considering this result, it is probably not advisable for you to refuse to submit to such a test.  The main reason for this is that the results of the test, should you submit to it, can still be challenged in criminal court.  If you refuse, your license will be suspended in a civil proceeding and there will be little you can do to challenge the suspension. You can delay the suspension by demanding a hearing in front of a judge, but that is often delaying the inevitable since there exist only very narrow grounds for overturning an automatic PennDOT suspension. 

Even if you believe that you were pulled over illegally, it is still probably advisable for you to submit to the test and then challenge the results later in court.  If the police stopped you illegally, then the results of the test will most likely be found to be inadmissible as evidence.             

This issue and others related to it are complicated and it is important that you consult with an attorney when you are faced with loss of your driver’s license, fines, or even imprisonment following a DUI/DWI arrest.  Do not assume that you are guilty. There are many different factors that go into the determination of whether or not you may be successfully prosecuted for a DUI crime. Our lawyers may be able to have your charges dismissed, keep you out of jail, keep your fines to a minimum, or help you retain your
driving privileges. Call 215-545-0008 or email Sadek Law Offices now to schedule a free initial consultation with one of our DUI/DWI attorneys.

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to DUI Law  in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email info@sadeklaw.com.  Thank you.

The “Marital Estate”

May 25th, 2010

Under Pennsylvania Divorce law, if a divorcing couple is unable to reach an agreement as to how their real and personal property will be divided, the court will use a system called “equitable distribution” and order the property award as part of the divorce decree. 

 Equitable distribution does not mean that the property will be divided equally at the time of divorce.  Rather, equitable distribution means that the property will be divided in a manner that the court deems to be fair.  In order to determine how it will fairly divide that property, the court will first determine which property and debt is considered marital.  The property and debt that is determined to be marital is called the “marital estate.”  The court will then assign a dollar value to the property and debt.  Finally, the court will distribute the property or assets between the parties in an equitable fashion.  

Under this method of property division, it is of the utmost importance for individuals going through a divorce to know what property and debt will be considered part of the marital estate.  There are many rules that are used to determine what will be included in the marital estate and also many exceptions to those rules.  That being said, there are some basic guidelines that anyone involved in divorce proceedings should be familiar with.   

All property acquired during the marriage is presumed to be marital property.  Property acquired post-separation in exchange for marital assets is marital property.  Property acquired during cohabitation prior to marriage is not marital property.  The equitable distribution provisions of the Divorce Code are “title blind” in that the determination of marital property is without regard to title, whether it is held individually or by the parties jointly.  The intent of the parties, as evidenced by their behavior, determines the characterization of property as marital or separate.  

Although marital property is generally valued as of the date of distribution, the determination of what is marital property is made as of the date of separation.  Property received post-separation but earned during the marriage and prior to final separation is marital property.  The increase in value during the marriage of separate property is marital property.  On the other hand, post-separation increases in the value of separate property are not includable in the marital estate.  

The Divorce Code also outlines statutory exclusions from marital property.  These include property acquired prior to marriage or property acquired in exchange for property acquired prior to the marriage, property excluded by a valid agreement of the parties made before or during the marriage or post-separation, property acquired by gift, devise, or descent or property acquired in exchange for such property, and property acquired subsequent to final separation.  

Again, the rules outlined above are only a few examples of those determining what property will be divided at the time of divorce and how that property will be divided.  There are many additional rules and exceptions are numerous and complex.  It is important for couples going through a divorce to seek legal counsel and to consider all their options in order for them to be able to exercise the most control over the disposition of their marital and separate property and debts at the time of divorce.  It is recommended that you seek a consultation with a lawyer specializing in family law.  You may call Sadek Law Offices, LLC to set up your initial consultation regarding divorce or family law.  

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to divorce law  in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email info@sadeklaw.com.  Thank you.

Intersection of Divorce and Bankruptcy

May 11th, 2010

 

 

Divorce

 

Bankruptcy and Divorce 

Bankruptcy and Family Law issues often go hand in hand.  Financial difficulties can often result in divorce and vice versa.  Keeping that in mind, it is important to be aware of the numerous ways in which your or your spouse’s bankruptcy can potentially affect your or your spouse’s ability to pursue and obtain a divorce.    

The automatic stay is one of the fundamental debtor protections provided by bankruptcy laws.  It gives the debtor a breathing spell from his or her creditors.  It stops all collection efforts, all harassment, and all foreclosure actions.  The stay, which becomes effective instantly at the time of the filing of a bankruptcy petition, is intended to immediately put the debtor and the debtor’s property under the protection of the bankruptcy court.  

The stay bars the commencement or continuation of any judicial, administrative or other action against the debtor that was or could have been commenced before the commencement of the bankruptcy case or to recover a claim against the debtor that arose before the bankruptcy case.  Any civil action arising out of circumstances that existed prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case is prohibited.  

As you can see, the scope of the automatic stay is very wide.  Due to the extremely wide scope of the stay, it extends to most family-related proceedings and can have a dramatic effect on these proceedings.  In particular, divorce proceedings can be impacted greatly by the stay.  A pending divorce case is automatically stayed upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition. 

The automatic stay also stays any judicial proceeding, including divorce, that could have been commenced against the debtor prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy case.  Since usually the spouse initiating a divorce petition could have done so earlier, before the petition was filed, the stay would bar the initiation of a divorce against the debtor in such cases after the filing of the bankruptcy case.  There are certain exceptions to these rules, however, so it is important that you consult with a divorce or bankruptcy attorney to determine whether they apply in your case.  

In summary, the decision to file for divorce or bankruptcy is one that must be carefully reviewed and planned.  It is recommended that you seek a consultation with a lawyer specializing in these fields of law.  You may call Sadek Law Offices, LLC to set up your initial consultation regarding the intersection of bankruptcy law and family law.  

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy or divorce law  in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email info@sadeklaw.com.  Thank you.

Real Estate and Bankruptcy

April 30th, 2010

foreclosure-for-sale-sign

In bankruptcy, a homeowner who has fallen behind on mortgage payments may have two options, surrender the real estate through Chapter 7 Bankruptcy or pay back the accrued arrearages in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy repayment plan.  The goal of most homeowners is to keep their home, however, sometimes it just doesn’t make short or long term financial sense to do so. 

For example, a homeowner has a mortgage in the amount of $200,000.00 and has an additional $25,000.00 in arrearages (past due payments); to determine whether it is in their best interests to keep the real estate two factors must be considered 1. value of the home and 2. affordability. 

1. Value of Home.  Our bankruptcy lawyers perform an internet value search at every initial consultation.   In the event that the aforementioned subject real estate is worth $150,000.00, it would not be worth paying the mortgage and trustee payment on a residence that is so far under-water in terms of equity.   Further, in todays real estate market especially, it is foreseeable that the value can fall even lower and therefore the homeowner would be making payments on a depreciating asset with upside down equity.  In the event the home is worth near or exceeds the mortgage amount then affordability must be considered to ascertain whether it is in the homeowner’s best interest to retain the real estate.

2. Affordability.  There are many reasons why a homeowner(s) would fall behind on their mortgage payments.  However, if the cause was a short term financial situation, such as a loss of a job and the homeowner is now back to work then retaining the real estate and paying back the arrearages would be a viable option. 

Chapter 13 Bankruptcy helps thousands of homeowners retain their properties.  The Chapter 13 Bankruptcy plan will be successful if the homeowner(s) can now afford the regular monthly mortgage payment and paying back the arrearages (at zero percent interest) over a five year period. 

In summary, the decision to retain or surrender a property is one that needs to be carefully reviewed and planned, I advise you to seek a consultation with a lawyer specializing in this field of law.  You may call Sadek Law Offices, LLC to set up your initial consultation regarding the intersection of bankruptcy law and  real property. 

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy law in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email brad@sadeklaw.com. Thank you.

Reaffirm, Redeem or Surrender?

April 15th, 2010

Under applicable bankruptcy laws, one has three choices with respect to an existing automobile and loan payments.  First, one may continue making the contractual payments when and as due on the automobile, which is known as “reaffirming” the debt. 

Second, one may “surrender” the collateral vehicle and no longer be responsible for future monthly payments monthly .  Further, when one surrenders and automobile through Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, any monetary deficiency is deemed unsecured general nonpriority debt and is  therefore discharged through the cours of the bankruptcy proceeding. 

The thrid and last option is to “Redeem” the property.  The redemption process in bankruptcy requires a motion in compliance with Section 722 of the US Bankruptcy Code.  The  Rededmption is ultimately a refinance of the vehicle or other personal property based on fair market value of the vehicle or property at the time of filing, rather than paying the full contractual amount due at the time of filing.  For example if one owes $15,000.00 on their vehicle at the time of filing that is now worth only $10,000.00, only $10,000.00 need be paid.  The fair market value of the vehicle is paid through a refinance of the vehicle.  The process is commonly known as a 722 Redemption and has saved filers thousands of dollars.   Sadek Law Offices, LLC works with lenders and services in the Chapter 7 Redemption process

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy law in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email brad@sadeklaw.com. Thank you.

New Mortgage Modification Plan

March 31st, 2010

Due to the failures of previous mortgage modification initiatives and continued defaults on modified loans, the govermnet is unveiling a new plan.  The new plan targets two main types of homeowners; 1. those who owe more on their houses then they are worth and 2. those who are jobless and most need financial assistance. 

For those who are “underwater” financially on their homes under the new plan, may refinance into loans backed by the Federal Housing Authority.  In exchange the Federal Housing Authority would receive up to $14 billion in government bailout money.  According to Moody’s analytics more than 15 million homeowners are underwater on their residences. 

For unemployed borrowers, those receiving unemployment benefits would have their mortgage payments reduced to no more than 31% of their monthly income for 3 to 6 months.  Once the borrower finds a job, then the mortgage payments may be modified or revert back to the contracted amount due and owing.   

The success of the new plan depends on many factors, primarily the cooperation of private banks and lending institutions who are right now not in theposition to afford lesser payments. 

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy law in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email brad@sadeklaw.com. Thank you.

File Chapter 13 Bankruptcy in Philadelphia

March 23rd, 2010

img_chapter13

A Chapter 13 Bankruptcy may be filed in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for several reasons.  The three most common situations that a person or married couple qualifies for a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy repayment plan are listed herein below:

Situation #1

A person is facing mortgage foreclosure or a tax sale on their home. By virtue of the automatic stay in Bankruptcy, upon the Bankruptcy filing on your behalf the foreclosure or tax sale is stopped. In exchange, the homeowner will pay back the mortgage or tax arrearages interest free while enjoying their home. Additionally, if any other unsecured debts exist they will be paid a mere percentage and included in the Chapter 13 Bankruptcy plan.

Scenario #2

In 2005 the Bankruptcy laws were amended. Among other changes, the medium income standards were implemented. Generally, if a person or couple’s income exceeds the medium income standards then a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is presumed appropriate. There are a many factors in determining if a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is necessitated based on income and therefore it is imperative that you consult out Bankruptcy Attorneys to fully discuss your situation.

Situation #3

A person has equity over the bankruptcy exemptions in personal or real property. Using the “liquidation analysis” the court will mandate a payment toward unsecured debt up to the amount of the non-exempt equity or the amount of the debt itself. Although this scenario may sound confusing, the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC can explain if you fall into this rare category of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy.

The biggest difference between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is that in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy a repayment Plan is filed.  The Petitioner makes a payment every month on a regular basis for a period of three (3) to five (5) years.  The benefit of a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is that the debts contained in the bankruptcy are paid back at 0% interest. 

As in a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, there is a 341 Meeting where the trustee reviews your petition for truth and accuracy.  The hearing is generally up to a half an hour long.  Subsequent to the 341 Meeting, there is a Confirmation hearing, where the creditors and trustee have an oppurtunity to object to the filed Plan and request an amendment or modification to the Subject Plan.  If the Plan is successful at the Confirmation stage, the Judge will sign an Order “Confirming” the Plan.   Chapter 13 Bankruptcy can be a very complex and time consuming process, it is essential that you hire competent counsel to guide you through the entire process. 

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy law in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email brad@sadeklaw.com. Thank you.

How to File Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

March 11th, 2010

Chapter_7

Initially, it is important to make certain that you qualify for a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.  There are several steps one must take in anticipation of filing a bankruptcy, it would be a waste of both time and money to find out down the road that you don’t qualify for the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy relief desired.    To determine eligibility of filing a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, our law office performs an appraisal on any real estate owned and calculates family income and expenses.  A home appraisal is necessary to determine whether any non-exempt equity exists.  Further, family income and expenses are most relevant for means testing under the Bankruptcy Code

 Once it is determined that one qualifies for Bankruptcy, we must analyze your debt.  A Chapter 7 Bankruptcy discharge is generally a discharge of all unsecured non-priority debt, such as credit cards, personal loans, medical bills, pay day loans, past due utility bills, etc.  The debts that are not included in a Chapter 7 are priority or non-dischargeable debts such as most IRS debts, child support, alimony, government fines and student loans.  As far as secured debts, homes and cars, the filing party usually has the choice to reaffirm (keep), redeem(keep and lower payments based on fair market value) or surrender (give back) the secured property. 

So now that it is determined that you are eligible and what debts need to be included, there are several items our office will need from you in order to file an accurate bankruptcy petition on your behalf.  Such items include pay stubs, tax returns, driver’s license, social security cards, financial statements and other easily accessible documents.  After all items are provided credit counseling will be ordered on your behalf.  Clients frequently ask me, do I have to go to a counseling class and for how long?  The class is set up for you to complete online or over the phone in the comfort and privacy of your own home and generally takes 20-40 minutes, upon your completion a certificate is automatically emailed to our Philadelphia bankruptcy law office.  Upon completion of the course and putting all documents into a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Petition, the filing is made on your behalf. 

Once the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy filing is made, all creditors must stop all collection action against you, meaning all letters, phone calls and lawsuits muct cease by virtue of the automatic stay employed in a bankruptcy filing.  In a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, there is usually only one meeting one must attend.  It is known as the 341 Meeting, held in an administrative setting and usually lasts less than 20 minutes.  After the 341 Meeting, one must complete the second course, financial management and the only thing then to do is wait for a discharge.  The Discharge in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy generally takes 90-120 after the meeting days to be mailed to the Petitioner.  After you receive the discharge you are officially debt free! 

If there are any general questions or topics you would like to read about relating to bankruptcy law in the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania region, you may contact the Philadelphia Bankruptcy Lawyers at Sadek Law Offices, LLC at 215-545-0008  or (877) 4-LAW-411 or email brad@sadeklaw.com. Thank you.